Grammar Can Save Lives?!

Are you in the mood to tackle a grammar lesson the means so much more than just understanding sentence structure? You know I live for this grammar stuff; I could diagram sentences all day long! I understand 99% of the population would prefer not to join in the activity – truly, I understand. But the intent of some sentences can be discerned only when their structure is acknowledged, and that can make a critical difference in understanding the intended meaning – a real difference to a country and even to the world. Would you take 15 minutes to explore a few sentences and learn the simple lesson I’m offering?

I have four sentences below, all constructed in similar manner, but each about a different topic. Each is followed by four simple questions – and their answers. I ask you to work through each little sample thoughtfully. At the end I’ll offer a clear, concise explanation for why, in this particular case, fidelity to the intended meaning, indicated by sentence structure, is absolutely critical to the human race. Please do this one little grammar lesson with me.

An ice-free sidewalk being necessary to the safety of our elderly residents, all nursing home sidewalks shall be cleared and salted after each snowfall.

  1. For what reason do we clear and salt our sidewalks?

    1. For the safety of elderly residents

  2. Are sidewalks to be cleared and salted after rainfalls?

    1. No. After snowfalls

  3. Are we expected to clear and salt the sidewalks of surrounding private property?

    1. No. Just the nursing home sidewalks

  4. Should someone be salting the sidewalks every day of the year?

    1. No. Just when it snows

Nutritious snacks being beneficial to growing children, students will be allowed to keep fresh fruits and vegetables in their desks.

  1. For what reason are students allowed to have fruits and vegetables on hand?

    1. To have a nutritious snack

  2. Are students allowed to keep candy in their desks?

    1. No. Just fruits and vegetables

  3. Do students have an inherent right to sell fruits and vegetables in school?

    1. No. They have only the right to keep them in their desks.

  4. May students have fruits and vegetables in their lockers?

    1. No. Only in their desks

Service dogs being necessary for the well-being of persons identified with special needs, the people’s right to own registered service dogs shall not be infringed.

  1. For what purpose is a person allowed to own a service dog?

    1. To address special needs

  2. May I have a registered service dog just because I love dogs?

    1. No. You may have one to serve special needs.

  3. Who has the right to own a registered service dog?

    1. People with special needs

  4. Is  my right to breed service dogs and sell them guaranteed above?

    1. No, even if you have special needs

A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the people’s right to bear arms shall not be infringed.

  1. For what purpose shall the people bear arms?

    1. To provide a well-regulated militia for the state

  2. For what purpose shall a free state maintain an armed militia?

    1. For the state’s security

  3. Do I have a guaranteed right to carry a gun to the mall or to church?

    1. No. Only to the well-regulated militia

  4. Does this give me the right to own a gun because I love guns?

    1. No. It gives you a right to own a gun to participate in the state militia.

Okay, you get the point, right? It is crystal clear that the Second Amendment to the Constitution gave individuals the right to bear arms for the purpose of ensuring a well-regulated militia ready to defend the state against a president-king. Our country’s founders, fresh from the War of Independence, were not sure a popularly elected president could be trusted to stay in his lane, so they provided this right to each state. Obviously, to have such a militia, the free white men in the state would have to bring a gun to training and, in the worst case, muster to fight as a militia, armed to defend their state against an unlawful king. (Today we call that militia the state’s National Guard, and its weapons are stored in an armory, not in guardsmen’s homes.)

Yes, in 2008, the Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Heller, ruled that a citizen may possess a gun and keep it in his home, not to serve in the state’s National Guard, but for “self-defense.” In my humble opinion, that was a willful misreading of the amendment. Then, in 2022, in NY State Rifle and Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, the Court affirmed the right to carry a gun in public for self-defense. And so, the intent and purpose of the Second Amendment was again ignored by willfully misreading its grammatical structure. Sometimes grammar does matter. What have been the consequences?

Today that little country of 13 states simply seeking to defend themselves against a tyrant has grown to 340 million people who, collectively, possess 400-500 million guns: A gun-and-a-half for every person. The U.S. is home to 4.2% of the world’s population and 46% of the world’s guns.

On an average day in our nation, 325 people suffer gunshot wounds, and 125 of them die. If you define a “mass shooting” as four or more injured victims, we now average about 417 mass shootings each year. The leading cause of death today in American children is not measles or polio or tuberculosis; it’s firearms.

If you believe the free possession and transport of guns, willy nilly, has not made our country unsafe and unwholesome, you and I live on two different planets. (Chances are you don’t care much for sentence structure either.) Thank you for working through this little lesson with me, though. As a reward, I’m offering you two quick, easily interpreted graphics about the subjects our four sentences above dealt with: senior citizens, hungry kids, service dogs, households, and guns. No relation to sentence structure. What do you think?

If my grammar lesson has piqued the interest of just one reader, I am overjoyed. I’ve written about this topic repeatedly, and I invite you to read my previous essays:

 

School Shootings Can be Stopped (December 2024)

Oh, Quit Wringing your Hands (January 2023)

Flying Solo? Maybe Not (November 2022)

Want the Shooting to Stop? (July 2022)

I Oppose Gun Control (May 2022)

Write it so they’ll Read it.

We don’t write much these days, do we? (Well, that is,  perhaps you don’t write much; I write all the time – can’t help myself!) But we’re in the digital world, reading brief text messages from our watches, able to call and speak to anyone anywhere at any time, listening to podcasts and audio books... We just don’t often use the fine art of carefully crafted written sentences – until we have to... until it really matters, and then we’re out of practice, awkward and confused, just when we need to write something powerful, effective – and concise (because people don’t read a lot of words anymore either, do they?).

Read More

WordSense

Recently a friend said to me, “I like it when you post articles about how to write better and speak more effectively. Those are the things I most like to read in the Speakeasy.” On the one hand, that’s great, because that’s the kind of stuff with which I love to grapple. On the other hand, it stinks, because I really can’t find anything new to say. I just keep harping about the same old things, and American speech and writing (even the “professional” kind – perhaps mostly the “professional” kind) just gets more and more problematic. But I’ll offer you my “top ten” today.

Read More

Down the Garden Path...

Meet Stacy Abrams, via Wikipedia: “born December 9, 1973... an American politician, lawyer, voting rights activist, and author who served in the Georgia House of Representatives from 2007 to 2017...” What interests  me about Ms. Abrams today, however, is her ten-step warning about the path democracies take as they slip into authoritarianism. Abrams’ 10 Steps were apparently based on the research of Kim Lane Scheppele, Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs at Princeton. I’m going to list those ten steps below, and I’m going to restrain myself: I’ll list each without comment.

Read More

“Prone to Rot”

Okay, that’s not what Sister Dorothy Marie taught me about American democracy in eighth-grade civics. In fact, I have recently come to the sad realization that my rosy view of our country’s beginnings, developed through mandatory study of history and civics from elementary school through college (for which I am most grateful), created an unrealistic reverence for our country’s birth as the world’s first perfect democracy.

Read More

Pull those Weeds!

It’s spring. You’re probably one of those people who love to go out and prepare the soil, buy the plants for flower and vegetable gardens, and pull the weeds already rearing their heads. You love that stuff, right? Good for you; I don’t. I spend as little time tending to my yard and flower beds as is legally possible. That said, I’ve got some “weeds” I’d like to tend to this spring. Will you join me?

Read More

Is it Free $peech?

(Note from Lynn: I asked my smart friend, Judy Nagel, retired Wells Fargo Financial Advisor and active member of Rotary International, to share with us her perspective on a proposed amendment to the Constitution regarding needed campaign finance reform. And so we ask you to consider: Is it free $peech?)

Yes, you read that correctly: I want to know whether money is part of free speech, because the United States Supreme Court said it is. Remember Citizens United in 2010, when the Court ruled that restricting political spending by corporations and unions is inconsistent with the First Amendment? Money talks, I guess, and we’re not allowed to silence it.

Read More

The Speech I Never Gave

Recently I spent a good bit of time preparing to address the City of Green Bay Finance Committee: It would be my second plea to them to please make our local property tax bill transparent by noting, not just how much tax money goes to the Green Bay Area Public Schools, but also how much of that money is immediately diverted away from our public schools to fund tuition vouchers for children to attend 12 local private schools. I listened – and then I chose not to speak. The ensuing discussion suggested to me that perhaps I should have spoken up. Here’s what I would have said…

Read More